Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Daniel Read on software and Apgar scores
Daniel Read blogs on the topic: "Does software need an Apgar score?". He mentions the fact that a simple metric (the Apgar score for newborns) revolutionized the childbirth process, "through standardization of techniques, training, and regulation of who exactly was allowed to perform certain procedures (based on whether they had the training and experience)". He then talks about how a similar simple score might help the quality of software development, by assessing its "health". Hmmm... all this sounds strangely familiar to me -- Cheesecake anybody? Of course, Daniel accepts that this idea is highly controversial and maybe a bit simplistic. However, I for one am convinced that it would help with improving, if not the quality, then at least the kwalitee of the software packages we see in the wild today.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
This post is a continuation of my previous one on " Running Gatling tests in Docker containers via Jenkins ". As I continued to se...
-
I know the title of this post doesn't make much sense, I wrote it that way so that people who run into issues similar to mine will have ...
-
For the last month or so I've been experimenting with Rancher as the orchestration layer for Docker-based deployments. I've been pr...
3 comments:
Hey man, you keep your fascist "metrics" to yourself -- my code is unique and special, and not only defies categorization but cannot be ranked or measured!
;)
Well, Anonymous, all I can say is: I hope your code is at least *tested* (and if I know you, then it is) :-)
I think trying to regulate software just puts restrictions on something that almost doesn't have any.
Matthew
http://www.BecomeAGameTester.com
Post a Comment