Tuesday, February 27, 2007

testing-in-python mailing list

Titus created a mailing list dedicated to topics related to testing in Python. If you're interested, you can subscribe via its mailman interface here. We hope it will become a discussion forum for things such as:
  • testing tools that people have successfully used in their projects
  • testing techniques that help in certain situations (mocking for example)
  • real life scenarios where a specific type of testing (e.g. functional) helped more than another type of testing (e.g. unit)
  • etc. etc.
I think I will affectionately refer to this list as TIP from now on :-)

Update 02/28/07

What do you know, the name TIP struck a chord, so Titus created an alias for it. You can now send email to the list via tip at lists.idyll.org too.

William McVey's PyCon notes as mindmap

Via Elliot Murphy's blog, a very nice mindmap created by William McVey and showing his notes from PyCon07. It demonstrates the power of mindmaps: a lot of information condensed in one page, with links to more detailed information below.

Also from William, other PyCon07 notes.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Testing Tools Panel at PyCon

I'd like to thank the participants in the Testing Tools Panel at PyCon07 for sharing their insights into testing with the audience. Here they are, in alphabetical order of first name:
  • Benji York: zope.testbrowser
  • Brian Dorsey: py.test (representing Holger Krekel)
  • Chad Whitacre: testosterone (created) switched to nose
  • Ian Bicking: paste.test.fixture, minimock, FitLoader
  • Jeff Younker: PyMock
  • Kumar McMillan: fixture - module for loading and referencing test data
  • Martin Taylor: test framework within TI
  • Neal Norwitz: PyChecker
  • Tim Couper: WATSUP (Windows GUI Testing)
  • Titus Brown: twill, scotch, figleaf, pinocchio

Matt Harrison has a very good write-up on the discussions we had during the panel (actually I lifted the list above from his blog post, because he summarized it so well).

One thing that I think all the participants felt, and maybe the audience too, was that 45 minutes was totally not sufficient for this kind of panel. And I know I felt the same thing with the other two panels, for Python-dev and for the Web frameworks. So I'd like to ask people to leave some comments on this post, with ideas about turning these panels into discussions that would last longer, at least 1 hour and even more.

My gut feeling is that there would be a lot of interest in getting framework/library/tool creators together and having a discussion/Q&A with them in front of the audience, with audience participation of course. I'm not sure what the best format would be for this kind of thing -- maybe a round table? But if we get enough ideas, maybe we can fit something like this in next year's PyCon schedule, and allocate it a generous amount of time.

Testability

During the Testing Tools tutorial that Titus and I gave at PyCon, there was a short discussion on testability -- what makes software more testable? I mentioned a list put together by Michael Bolton, and summarized/enhanced by Adam Goucher in this blog post. Recommended reading, both for developers who want to add testing hooks into their software, and for testers who want to know what to ask for from developers so that their life gets easier (and if you're one of the unfortunate souls who have to deal with Java or .NET, this blog post by Roy Osherove talks about testability and pure OOP.)

Although our tutorial was focused on tools and techniques for implementing test automation, we also mentioned that you will never be able to get rid of manual testing. Even though the Google testing team says that 'Life is too short for manual testing' (and I couldn't agree more with them), they hasten to qualify this slogan by adding that automated testing frees you up to do more meaningful exploratory testing.

My experience as a tester shows that the nastiest bugs are often discovered by manual testing. But when you do discover them manually, the best strategy is to write automated tests for them, so that you'll check your application in that particular area from that moment on, via an automated test suite which runs in your continuous integration system.

You do have an automated test suite, right? And it does run periodically (daily or upon on every check-in) in a continuous integration system, right? And you have everything set up so that you're notified by email or RSS feeds when something fails, right? And you fix failures quickly so that everything turns back to green, because you know that too much red, too often, leads to broken windows and bit rot, right?

If you answered No to any of these questions, then you are not testing your application, period (but you already knew this if you took our tutorial -- it was on the last slide :-)

Friday, February 23, 2007

Photos from PyCon panels

Here are photos I took today at the python-dev panel and at the Web frameworks panel. Enjoy!

BTW, here are two very good write-ups on the Web framework panel: one from Matt Harrison, the other from James Bennett.

PyCon day 1

Gave the testing tutorial with Titus yesterday; went pretty well from the feedback we got. We'll publish the slides soon.

Just got out of the first keynote, Ivan Krstic's talk on the "One Laptop Per Child" project. Pretty interesting -- here are some tidbits I remember:
  • OLPC wants to change the way teaching and learning is done these days; they want to go back to the time when preschool kids interacted with each other by playing, and learned naturally peer-to-peer (as opposed to institutionalized teaching, which is one-to-many)
  • contrary to popular opinion, the laptop does not have a hand crank (it would wear down too fast if it had one); however, the laptop can be powered by a pull string that reacts to the puller's strength and powers the device accordingly
  • the 2 rabbit ears are used for wireless; the laptop can speak 802.11s, a new protocol that can be used for fully meshed networking; as soon as one laptop is connected to the internet, all the other ones in its mesh will be connected too
  • the CPU is an AMD Geode at 366 MHz (not 400 or 500, actually 366)
  • no hard drive, uses 512 MB of flash storage
  • OS is a stripped-down version of Fedora
  • runs Python wherever it can (including the init boot daemon); some exceptions are the X.org windowing system, the mDNS daemon, and the bus communication; pretty much all other user-level software, including the file system, is written in Python
  • the laptop has a 'show source' button which obviously shows Python source code that can be edited, etc.
  • no adult has ever been able to open the laptop in less than 2 minutes
  • no child has ever needed more than 30 seconds to open the laptop
  • two fortunate souls got an OLPC XO laptop today: Guido (as the creator of Python), and a guy who was able to recognize a very complicated formula that Ivan showed on a slide (the BBP formula for computing the n-th decimal place of pi); the guy needed approx. 1 minute to open the laptop; Guido's was already open, in a sign of respect I guess
  • OLPC needs good Python developers; if you're interested, check out dev.laptop.org

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Wikipatterns

Via Grady Booch's blog, a site which looks very promising: Wikipatterns. It identifies patterns and anti-patterns for wiki adoption. Here's an excerpt:

"Any grassroots, or bottom-up, strategy is the best place to start since the success of a wiki depends on building active, sustainable participation and this only happens when people see that the software is simple enough to immediately be useful, and meets their needs without requiring them to spend lots of extra time.

A good first step is to identify a group or department who would likely benefit the most from using a wiki, and whose people are open to trying new tools. If you're looking to expand wiki use in another group, look for the thought leader in the group - someone who is very forward thinking, respected by peers, and willing to Champion a new idea and get others around them involved."


Seems like a very good complement to a book I read recently: "Fearless Change: Patterns for Introducing New Ideas" by Mary Lynn Manns and Linda Rising.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Anybody doing LDom on Solaris Sparc?

Lazy Web-type question: has anybody tried out the brand new LDom functionality available in Solaris 10? From some googling around I've done, it seems Sun hasn't yet shipped the full-fledged LDom functionality in Solaris 10 version 11/06.

LDom seems like a cool way to partition some big Solaris Sparc boxes, if you have them. I wonder if the logical domains/virtual machines created with LDom can have Ubuntu installed on top of them (because Ubuntu supports Solaris Sparc).

The Buildbot project has a Trac instance as its home

Brian Warner just announced on the buildbot-devel mailing list that his Buildbot project has a brand new home in the form of a Trac instance. Check it out here. Glad to see the move, as Trac is so much nicer to work with than the clunky SourceForge interface.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Ubuntu not to activate proprietary drivers by default

This just in via Jonathan Carter's blog on Planet Ubuntu: the Ubuntu Technical Board has decided that Ubuntu will not activate proprietary drivers by default. Proprietary drivers will be provided for convenience, and users will of course be free to install them if they so choose. This should settle a controversy which has been raging for a while in the Ubuntu community.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Cheesecake Service launched

The Cheesecake Service is a result of Michał Kwiatkowski's hard work during the Google Summer of Code 2006. The Web interface for the service is based on web.py and it has been up and running since last August, but we're making it public now, to coincide with the release of Cheesecake 0.6.1.

The back-end of the Cheesecake Service talks directly to the PyPI repository using the PyPI API in order to find out about packages newly posted to PyPI. Then the service uses Cheesecake and tries to download, install, and score the package. If your package is not there, it might mean you haven't released a new version after August 10, 2006, date from which we started to score packages. Let us know and we can manually score it so that it appears in the list.

Michał just posted a blog entry on Cheesecake and its Service, so please read it and let us know how we can improve on the various things he describes. We are aware that scoring packages is controversial, and we've been called names before because of it, but as Michał also says, the Cheesecake score is meant to be used as a relative number by creators of Python packages who can try to improve it, and not as an absolute ranking among packages. Think of it as an Apgar score for your software.

Kudos to Michał for his continuing hard work on new Cheesecake features and improvements.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Internal blogs as project tracking tools

I'm reading "The Corporate Blogging Book" by Debbie Weil. She talks about two different types of blogs -- internal (Intranet-type) and external (public access) -- and she mentions how some big name companies use internal blogs for all sorts of purposes: knowledge/information sharing, email replacement, and, the thing that caught my attention, project management. Apparently IBM is big on all these things when it comes to internal blogs.

So I had a mini-revelation: an internal blog is a very good tool for tracking time you spend on various projects. Take the example of a hosting company -- it can set up an internal blog and have categories corresponding to various projects/customers; employees can jot down a summary of what they worked on each day, and put it in the appropriate category. After a while, a timeline of work done on particular projects emerges. Because posts are automatically dated, it's easy to see what you were working on 3 weeks or 3 months ago. And each blog post can contain links to more detailed howtos that are kept in a wiki which serves as a knowledge base. Blogs and wikis make entering information a snap, as opposed to more complicated project management/tracking tools. Blogs and wikis are also searchable, so finding information is easy. To me, this is a lean/agile way of keeping track of your work.

Anyway, maybe this is an obvious use of blogs, but to me it's new, and of course I'm going to implement it :-)

Monday, February 05, 2007

New job

Today was my first day at RIS Technology, a Web hosting/managed services company which hosts grammy.com and missuniverse.com, among other sites. My responsibilities include selecting and helping implement various technologies that make up our offerings to our customers. Of course, if you follow my blog, you know that Python and automated testing are big in my book, so you can be sure that our offerings will include both :-) Stay tuned for more details.