Working with Amazon EC2 regions

Now that Amazon offers EC2 instances based in data centers in Europe, there is one more variable that you need to take into account when using the EC2 API: the concept of 'region'. Right now there are 2 regions to choose from: us-east-1 (based of course in the US on the East Coast), and the new region eu-west-1 based in Western Europe. Knowing Amazon, they will probably launch data centers in other regions across the globe -- Asia, South America, etc.

Each region has several availability zones. You can see the current ones in this nice article from the AWS Developer Zone. The default region is us-east-1, with 3 availability zones (us-east-1a, 1b and 1c). If you don't specify a region when you call an EC2 API tool, then the tool will query the default region. That's why I was baffled when I tried to launch a new AMI in Europe; I was calling 'ec2-describe-availability-zones' and it was returning only the US ones. After reading the article I mentioned, I realized I need to have 2 versions of my scripts: the old one I had will deal with the default US-based region, and the new one will deal with the Europe region by adding '--region eu-west-1' to all EC2 API calls (you need the latest version of the EC2 API tools from here).

You can list the zones available in a given region by running:

# ec2-describe-availability-zones --region eu-west-1
AVAILABILITYZONE eu-west-1a available eu-west-1
AVAILABILITYZONE eu-west-1b available eu-west-1
Note that all AWS resources that you manage belong to a given region. So if you want to launch an AMI in Europe, you have to create a keypair in Europe, a security group in Europe, find available AMIs in Europe, and launch a given AMI in Europe. As I said, all this is accomplished by adding '--region eu-west-1' to all EC2 API calls in your scripts.

Another thing to note is that the regions are separated in terms of internal DNS too. While you can access AMIs within the same zone based on their internal DNS names, this access doesn't work across regions. You need to use the external DNS name of an instance in Europe if you want to ssh into it from an instance in the US (and you also need to allow the external IP of the US instance to access port 22 in the security policy for the European instance.)

All this introduces more headaches from a management/automation point of view, but the benefits obviously outweigh the cost. You get low latency for your European customers, and you get more disaster recovery options.


Jurgen Appelo said…

You might be interested to know your blog is listed as #57 in the all new Top 100 Blogs for Developers, which I published an hour ago.

Hope you like the results!

Grig Gheorghiu said…
Hi, Jurgen

Thanks for pointing that out to me! Yes, I like the result very much!!! :-)

Ce sa spun , Grig , felcitari pentru modul in care este apreciata munca ta,este un imbold pe mai departe si-ti doresc sa ai parte de multe satisfactii.
Mike said…
The amazon European API implementation looks rushed. What worries me is not the headaches now, but what happens when Amazon fixes it and breaks a bunch of scripts with a new API.

Popular posts from this blog

Performance vs. load vs. stress testing

Dynamic DNS updates with nsupdate and BIND 9

Running Gatling load tests in Docker containers via Jenkins