tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9238405.post4382520309600558079..comments2024-03-18T02:04:50.380-07:00Comments on Agile Testing: Watch that Apache KeepAlive setting!Grig Gheorghiuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17863511617654196370noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9238405.post-81119252184206152792011-05-04T02:12:33.456-07:002011-05-04T02:12:33.456-07:00Keepalive has a different affect on memory and CPU...Keepalive has a different affect on memory and CPU. Turning keepalive off actually increases CPU usage. I wrote a blog post with a detailed analysis of <a href="http://abdussamad.com/archives/169-Apache-optimization:-KeepAlive-On-or-Off.html" rel="nofollow">Apache keepalive</a>.abdussamadhttp://abdussamad.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9238405.post-49850176570311357272009-10-06T10:58:28.777-07:002009-10-06T10:58:28.777-07:00Hayden -- yes, try setting KeepAlive Off and see h...Hayden -- yes, try setting KeepAlive Off and see how it goes. Another thing that's obviously recommended is to use a CDN service to offload static files off of your servers.Grig Gheorghiuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17863511617654196370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9238405.post-72853358387383248852009-10-04T21:30:28.513-07:002009-10-04T21:30:28.513-07:00I've been trying to find something difinitive ...I've been trying to find something difinitive on this topic. We have an image server it serves only, *.jpg, *.png, *.gif, *.css and *.js files.<br /><br />We have keep alive set to 5 seconds. Would setting keep alive to off be faster?Hayden Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04466575391595327036noreply@blogger.com